<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re: Your Brains- Men &amp; Women in Social Media Notoriety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why womENT &#171; Life of Biana</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Why womENT &#171; Life of Biana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>[...] men&#8217;s brains &#8220;are wired differently&#8221; as my friend Anna O&#8217;Brien points out in this post about men and women in social media notoriety. Women led businesses still aren&#8217;t getting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] men&#8217;s brains &#8220;are wired differently&#8221; as my friend Anna O&#8217;Brien points out in this post about men and women in social media notoriety. Women led businesses still aren&#8217;t getting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#39;s Your Tap Code? : People: Online &#38; Offline</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#39;s Your Tap Code? : People: Online &#38; Offline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-924</guid>
		<description>[...] Shelly Kramer and Anna O&#8217;Brien recently wrote blog posts about women in social media, and the dozens of conversations and comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shelly Kramer and Anna O&#8217;Brien recently wrote blog posts about women in social media, and the dozens of conversations and comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Frankly I love your response :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly I love your response <img src='http://www.randomactsofdata.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kunz</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Good insights.

Pan back a bit and you could say at the macro level, 1950s advertising was a male-oriented bragging medium while 2010s social media is a female-intuitive conversation, nurturing and listening medium. This could mean that acquisition (hunting) was more important in a capitalist society that had just begun producing massive amounts of consumers goods after World War II (hey, what&#039;s that -- a TV set!), and now socializing (gathering) is more important in a mature society where most U.S. consumers already own three televisions.

What I take away (to sound totally sexist) is the innate communication skills of women are a better fit for today&#039;s world than those of men.

If so, the ad industry -- still dominated by men -- and the tech industry -- ditto -- had better start hiring more diverse managers and giving them leadership opportunities. We&#039;re out of sync with society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good insights.</p>
<p>Pan back a bit and you could say at the macro level, 1950s advertising was a male-oriented bragging medium while 2010s social media is a female-intuitive conversation, nurturing and listening medium. This could mean that acquisition (hunting) was more important in a capitalist society that had just begun producing massive amounts of consumers goods after World War II (hey, what&#8217;s that &#8212; a TV set!), and now socializing (gathering) is more important in a mature society where most U.S. consumers already own three televisions.</p>
<p>What I take away (to sound totally sexist) is the innate communication skills of women are a better fit for today&#8217;s world than those of men.</p>
<p>If so, the ad industry &#8212; still dominated by men &#8212; and the tech industry &#8212; ditto &#8212; had better start hiring more diverse managers and giving them leadership opportunities. We&#8217;re out of sync with society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kunz</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>Good insights.

Pan back a bit and you could say at the macro level, 1950s advertising was a male-oriented bragging medium while 2010s social media is a female-intuitive conversation, nurturing and listening medium. This could mean that acquisition (hunting) was more important in a capitalist society that had just begun producing massive amounts of consumers goods after World War II (hey, what&#039;s that -- a TV set!), and now socializing (gathering) is more important in a mature society where most U.S. consumers already own three televisions.

What I take away (to sound totally sexist) is the innate communication skills of women are a better fit for today&#039;s world than those of men.

If so, the ad industry -- still dominated by men -- and the tech industry -- ditto -- had better start hiring more diverse managers and giving them leadership opportunities. We&#039;re out of sync with society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good insights.</p>
<p>Pan back a bit and you could say at the macro level, 1950s advertising was a male-oriented bragging medium while 2010s social media is a female-intuitive conversation, nurturing and listening medium. This could mean that acquisition (hunting) was more important in a capitalist society that had just begun producing massive amounts of consumers goods after World War II (hey, what&#8217;s that &#8212; a TV set!), and now socializing (gathering) is more important in a mature society where most U.S. consumers already own three televisions.</p>
<p>What I take away (to sound totally sexist) is the innate communication skills of women are a better fit for today&#8217;s world than those of men.</p>
<p>If so, the ad industry &#8212; still dominated by men &#8212; and the tech industry &#8212; ditto &#8212; had better start hiring more diverse managers and giving them leadership opportunities. We&#8217;re out of sync with society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Your Tap Code? &#171; People: Online &#38; Offline</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Your Tap Code? &#171; People: Online &#38; Offline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-758</guid>
		<description>[...] Shelly Kramer and Anna O&#8217;Brien recently wrote blog posts about women in social media, and the dozens of conversations and comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shelly Kramer and Anna O&#8217;Brien recently wrote blog posts about women in social media, and the dozens of conversations and comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention » Blog Archive » Re: Your Brains- Men &#38; Women in Social Media Notoriety -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention » Blog Archive » Re: Your Brains- Men &#38; Women in Social Media Notoriety -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-749</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shelly Kramer, Dr. Ellen Weber, janetfogarty, Kristi Jones, jillmcfarland and others. jillmcfarland said: RT @kjoneskc RT @ShellyKramer: Men &amp; Women and Their Social Media Differences &#124; GREAT post by @annaobrien &#124; http://bit.ly/8FlnEa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shelly Kramer, Dr. Ellen Weber, janetfogarty, Kristi Jones, jillmcfarland and others. jillmcfarland said: RT @kjoneskc RT @ShellyKramer: Men &amp; Women and Their Social Media Differences | GREAT post by @annaobrien | <a href="http://bit.ly/8FlnEa" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8FlnEa</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pooky Amsterdam</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Pooky Amsterdam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Loved this post, and even though I think equality was a step down (Shocking! ok I jest.....sort of) I do agree there are the different ways men and women are hard wired cerebrelly.  I appreciate the differences indeed, and see it  much the same way Dream in Data has described.  Men can think longer and stronger in one area while women have intuition as they can cross the hemispheres more readily getting a better panoramic view.  Together of course it gets even better.  
Having fresh insight on panels, in discussions and with people directly involved in media will make our understanding of how to use the new platforms available to us more effective. This entails taking chances, and also  opening up the spectrum to new platforms as well.  
My area of expertise is the 3D virtual world one.  I am one fo the two administrators for Women in Machinima on Facebook, and an award winning video producer using the graphical platform which is Second Life.
Yes I do feel that virtual worlds, Avatar based, easy to communicate upon and even more importantly to build community upon for products, services, charities, and brands are important.
I invite you to be a part of it and welcome the opportunity to show you first hand how it can aid customer integration and social media value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this post, and even though I think equality was a step down (Shocking! ok I jest&#8230;..sort of) I do agree there are the different ways men and women are hard wired cerebrelly.  I appreciate the differences indeed, and see it  much the same way Dream in Data has described.  Men can think longer and stronger in one area while women have intuition as they can cross the hemispheres more readily getting a better panoramic view.  Together of course it gets even better.<br />
Having fresh insight on panels, in discussions and with people directly involved in media will make our understanding of how to use the new platforms available to us more effective. This entails taking chances, and also  opening up the spectrum to new platforms as well.<br />
My area of expertise is the 3D virtual world one.  I am one fo the two administrators for Women in Machinima on Facebook, and an award winning video producer using the graphical platform which is Second Life.<br />
Yes I do feel that virtual worlds, Avatar based, easy to communicate upon and even more importantly to build community upon for products, services, charities, and brands are important.<br />
I invite you to be a part of it and welcome the opportunity to show you first hand how it can aid customer integration and social media value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pooky Amsterdam</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Pooky Amsterdam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>Loved this post, and even though I think equality was a step down (Shocking! ok I jest.....sort of) I do agree there are the different ways men and women are hard wired cerebrelly.  I appreciate the differences indeed, and see it  much the same way Dream in Data has described.  Men can think longer and stronger in one area while women have intuition as they can cross the hemispheres more readily getting a better panoramic view.  Together of course it gets even better.  
Having fresh insight on panels, in discussions and with people directly involved in media will make our understanding of how to use the new platforms available to us more effective. This entails taking chances, and also  opening up the spectrum to new platforms as well.  
My area of expertise is the 3D virtual world one.  I am one fo the two administrators for Women in Machinima on Facebook, and an award winning video producer using the graphical platform which is Second Life.
Yes I do feel that virtual worlds, Avatar based, easy to communicate upon and even more importantly to build community upon for products, services, charities, and brands are important.
I invite you to be a part of it and welcome the opportunity to show you first hand how it can aid customer integration and social media value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this post, and even though I think equality was a step down (Shocking! ok I jest&#8230;..sort of) I do agree there are the different ways men and women are hard wired cerebrelly.  I appreciate the differences indeed, and see it  much the same way Dream in Data has described.  Men can think longer and stronger in one area while women have intuition as they can cross the hemispheres more readily getting a better panoramic view.  Together of course it gets even better.<br />
Having fresh insight on panels, in discussions and with people directly involved in media will make our understanding of how to use the new platforms available to us more effective. This entails taking chances, and also  opening up the spectrum to new platforms as well.<br />
My area of expertise is the 3D virtual world one.  I am one fo the two administrators for Women in Machinima on Facebook, and an award winning video producer using the graphical platform which is Second Life.<br />
Yes I do feel that virtual worlds, Avatar based, easy to communicate upon and even more importantly to build community upon for products, services, charities, and brands are important.<br />
I invite you to be a part of it and welcome the opportunity to show you first hand how it can aid customer integration and social media value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-744</guid>
		<description>Frankly I love your response :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly I love your response <img src='http://www.randomactsofdata.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

