<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re: Your Brains- Men &amp; Women in Social Media Notoriety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#39;s Your Tap Code? : People: Online &#38; Offline</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#39;s Your Tap Code? : People: Online &#38; Offline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-924</guid>
		<description>[...] Shelly Kramer and Anna O&#8217;Brien recently wrote blog posts about women in social media, and the dozens of conversations and comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shelly Kramer and Anna O&#8217;Brien recently wrote blog posts about women in social media, and the dozens of conversations and comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Frankly I love your response :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly I love your response <img src='http://www.randomactsofdata.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kunz</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Good insights.

Pan back a bit and you could say at the macro level, 1950s advertising was a male-oriented bragging medium while 2010s social media is a female-intuitive conversation, nurturing and listening medium. This could mean that acquisition (hunting) was more important in a capitalist society that had just begun producing massive amounts of consumers goods after World War II (hey, what&#039;s that -- a TV set!), and now socializing (gathering) is more important in a mature society where most U.S. consumers already own three televisions.

What I take away (to sound totally sexist) is the innate communication skills of women are a better fit for today&#039;s world than those of men.

If so, the ad industry -- still dominated by men -- and the tech industry -- ditto -- had better start hiring more diverse managers and giving them leadership opportunities. We&#039;re out of sync with society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good insights.</p>
<p>Pan back a bit and you could say at the macro level, 1950s advertising was a male-oriented bragging medium while 2010s social media is a female-intuitive conversation, nurturing and listening medium. This could mean that acquisition (hunting) was more important in a capitalist society that had just begun producing massive amounts of consumers goods after World War II (hey, what&#8217;s that &#8212; a TV set!), and now socializing (gathering) is more important in a mature society where most U.S. consumers already own three televisions.</p>
<p>What I take away (to sound totally sexist) is the innate communication skills of women are a better fit for today&#8217;s world than those of men.</p>
<p>If so, the ad industry &#8212; still dominated by men &#8212; and the tech industry &#8212; ditto &#8212; had better start hiring more diverse managers and giving them leadership opportunities. We&#8217;re out of sync with society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Your Tap Code? &#171; People: Online &#38; Offline</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Your Tap Code? &#171; People: Online &#38; Offline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-758</guid>
		<description>[...] Shelly Kramer and Anna O&#8217;Brien recently wrote blog posts about women in social media, and the dozens of conversations and comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shelly Kramer and Anna O&#8217;Brien recently wrote blog posts about women in social media, and the dozens of conversations and comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention » Blog Archive » Re: Your Brains- Men &#38; Women in Social Media Notoriety -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention » Blog Archive » Re: Your Brains- Men &#38; Women in Social Media Notoriety -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-749</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shelly Kramer, Dr. Ellen Weber, janetfogarty, Kristi Jones, jillmcfarland and others. jillmcfarland said: RT @kjoneskc RT @ShellyKramer: Men &amp; Women and Their Social Media Differences &#124; GREAT post by @annaobrien &#124; http://bit.ly/8FlnEa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shelly Kramer, Dr. Ellen Weber, janetfogarty, Kristi Jones, jillmcfarland and others. jillmcfarland said: RT @kjoneskc RT @ShellyKramer: Men &amp; Women and Their Social Media Differences | GREAT post by @annaobrien | <a href="http://bit.ly/8FlnEa" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8FlnEa</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pooky Amsterdam</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Pooky Amsterdam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Loved this post, and even though I think equality was a step down (Shocking! ok I jest.....sort of) I do agree there are the different ways men and women are hard wired cerebrelly.  I appreciate the differences indeed, and see it  much the same way Dream in Data has described.  Men can think longer and stronger in one area while women have intuition as they can cross the hemispheres more readily getting a better panoramic view.  Together of course it gets even better.  
Having fresh insight on panels, in discussions and with people directly involved in media will make our understanding of how to use the new platforms available to us more effective. This entails taking chances, and also  opening up the spectrum to new platforms as well.  
My area of expertise is the 3D virtual world one.  I am one fo the two administrators for Women in Machinima on Facebook, and an award winning video producer using the graphical platform which is Second Life.
Yes I do feel that virtual worlds, Avatar based, easy to communicate upon and even more importantly to build community upon for products, services, charities, and brands are important.
I invite you to be a part of it and welcome the opportunity to show you first hand how it can aid customer integration and social media value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this post, and even though I think equality was a step down (Shocking! ok I jest&#8230;..sort of) I do agree there are the different ways men and women are hard wired cerebrelly.  I appreciate the differences indeed, and see it  much the same way Dream in Data has described.  Men can think longer and stronger in one area while women have intuition as they can cross the hemispheres more readily getting a better panoramic view.  Together of course it gets even better.<br />
Having fresh insight on panels, in discussions and with people directly involved in media will make our understanding of how to use the new platforms available to us more effective. This entails taking chances, and also  opening up the spectrum to new platforms as well.<br />
My area of expertise is the 3D virtual world one.  I am one fo the two administrators for Women in Machinima on Facebook, and an award winning video producer using the graphical platform which is Second Life.<br />
Yes I do feel that virtual worlds, Avatar based, easy to communicate upon and even more importantly to build community upon for products, services, charities, and brands are important.<br />
I invite you to be a part of it and welcome the opportunity to show you first hand how it can aid customer integration and social media value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-744</guid>
		<description>Frankly I love your response :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly I love your response <img src='http://www.randomactsofdata.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelly Kramer</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelly Kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-743</guid>
		<description>Frankly, Anna, I frankly wanted to see if I could use &quot;frankly&quot; any more often in a response - and frankly, wanted to see how many &quot;franklys&quot; I could fit into one sentence. 

Can you tell I wrote this after spending an entire day traveling from the East coast, stuck in the middle seat between two 4 yos who are, frankly, quite demanding? Without drinking?

Seriously, I not only wanted to make fun of my frankness, but also make sure you realized that I think you wrote a great post - and are totally spot-on with your assessments.

Frankly your friend,

Shelly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, Anna, I frankly wanted to see if I could use &#8220;frankly&#8221; any more often in a response &#8211; and frankly, wanted to see how many &#8220;franklys&#8221; I could fit into one sentence. </p>
<p>Can you tell I wrote this after spending an entire day traveling from the East coast, stuck in the middle seat between two 4 yos who are, frankly, quite demanding? Without drinking?</p>
<p>Seriously, I not only wanted to make fun of my frankness, but also make sure you realized that I think you wrote a great post &#8211; and are totally spot-on with your assessments.</p>
<p>Frankly your friend,</p>
<p>Shelly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention » Blog Archive » Re: Your Brains- Men &#38; Women in Social Media Notoriety -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention » Blog Archive » Re: Your Brains- Men &#38; Women in Social Media Notoriety -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-742</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Calvin Lee, KrisColvin, Liz Strauss, John Moore, Andrew Mueller and others. Andrew Mueller said: Great Post: Your Brains- Men &amp; Women in Social Media Notoriety, by @AnnaOBrien http://bit.ly/5OQche [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Calvin Lee, KrisColvin, Liz Strauss, John Moore, Andrew Mueller and others. Andrew Mueller said: Great Post: Your Brains- Men &amp; Women in Social Media Notoriety, by @AnnaOBrien <a href="http://bit.ly/5OQche" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5OQche</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelly Kramer</title>
		<link>http://www.randomactsofdata.com/re-your-brains-men-women-in-social-media-notoriety/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelly Kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomactsofdata.com/?p=178#comment-735</guid>
		<description>Great post, Anna. Which, of course, is no surprise. And a great overview of why each of the sexes behave the way they do.

And, while I agree with you that some women could step up and do more to promote themselves, I want to make sure that you know that my post was not at all lamenting that we aren&#039;t equal or looking for sympathy in any way.

Frankly, I feel equal to (or just as capable as) just about any one any where, male or female - and know that many of the women that I mentioned (and some that I didn&#039;t, yourself included) do as well. My post wasn&#039;t a pity party or intended to come off as a complaint in any way. It was simply an observation. Women are wired to excel in the realm of social media, just as they are wired to excel in the fields of marketing and PR and, even though that field seems to be dominated by men right now, I don&#039;t think it will be that way for long.

And frankly, it doesn&#039;t bother me a bit that men are currently engaged in the process of boasting and preening - frankly, I&#039;m too busy taking care of the myriad of clients that want to hire me to feel at all threatened by that. And I&#039;ll take paying clients (and happy ones) all day long over the glory of being center stage. Take that, preeners.

Seriously, you have written a great post and I do think it will become the norm to see more and more women headlining conferences. Event planners who don&#039;t look far enough to find those resources are doing themselves and their conference attendees a disservice in that regard. I also think that it wouldn&#039;t hurt for women to be a little more &quot;out there&quot; in terms of selling themselves and their abilities - but I am still confident and adamant to all who read either your post or mine - or both - that women aren&#039;t looking for a pity party.  We collectively know how capable we are - and I, for one, don&#039;t have any problem resting on those laurels.

Thanks for the great analysis and delving deeper into the issue - you&#039;re fantastico :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Anna. Which, of course, is no surprise. And a great overview of why each of the sexes behave the way they do.</p>
<p>And, while I agree with you that some women could step up and do more to promote themselves, I want to make sure that you know that my post was not at all lamenting that we aren&#8217;t equal or looking for sympathy in any way.</p>
<p>Frankly, I feel equal to (or just as capable as) just about any one any where, male or female &#8211; and know that many of the women that I mentioned (and some that I didn&#8217;t, yourself included) do as well. My post wasn&#8217;t a pity party or intended to come off as a complaint in any way. It was simply an observation. Women are wired to excel in the realm of social media, just as they are wired to excel in the fields of marketing and PR and, even though that field seems to be dominated by men right now, I don&#8217;t think it will be that way for long.</p>
<p>And frankly, it doesn&#8217;t bother me a bit that men are currently engaged in the process of boasting and preening &#8211; frankly, I&#8217;m too busy taking care of the myriad of clients that want to hire me to feel at all threatened by that. And I&#8217;ll take paying clients (and happy ones) all day long over the glory of being center stage. Take that, preeners.</p>
<p>Seriously, you have written a great post and I do think it will become the norm to see more and more women headlining conferences. Event planners who don&#8217;t look far enough to find those resources are doing themselves and their conference attendees a disservice in that regard. I also think that it wouldn&#8217;t hurt for women to be a little more &#8220;out there&#8221; in terms of selling themselves and their abilities &#8211; but I am still confident and adamant to all who read either your post or mine &#8211; or both &#8211; that women aren&#8217;t looking for a pity party.  We collectively know how capable we are &#8211; and I, for one, don&#8217;t have any problem resting on those laurels.</p>
<p>Thanks for the great analysis and delving deeper into the issue &#8211; you&#8217;re fantastico <img src='http://www.randomactsofdata.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
